At its Aug. 29 special meeting, the Bloomington Plan Commission 1) passed one “clean-up” amendment to the draft Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), 2) asked staff to develop six amendments for consideration on Sept. 5, and 3) directed staff to prepare another 11 UDO amendments to consider on Sept. 10 or at subsequent meetings.

Here’s a roundup of amendments that planning staff will be drafting for the Sept. 5 meeting. They were proposed by Planning Commission chair Joe Hoffmann and unanimously supported by the rest of the commission. The substance of the amendments will be debated and likely voted on at the Sept. 5 session, which starts at 5:30 p.m. at city hall council chambers.

UPDATE: It's likely that on Sept. 5 commissioners will only be deliberating on amendments related to duplexes, triplexes and quadplexes. The first set of draft amendments are now posted on the city's UDO update site.

1. An “omnibus” amendment to fix typos, misspellings, cross-references and other clerical errors. 
2. Teardowns. An amendment clarifying how teardowns will be discouraged on lots eligible for duplexes, triplexes and quadplexes.
3. Duplexes, triplexes and quadplexes. Two parallel amendments. One would eliminate “plexes” as a conditional use entirely in R1, R2 and R3 zones. An alternative amendment would return the plexes as a permitted use in those zones, as they were in an earlier draft of the UDO. 
4. ADUs. Two parallel amendments related to accessory dwelling units (ADUs). One would make ADUs a conditional use. The other would leave ADUs as a permitted use and allow two bedrooms, rather than one. It would also allow ADUs to be the same size as other permitted accessory units in the district, like garages. 

For Sept. 10 or later meetings, here are amendments that planning staff will be drafting, based on Plan Commission requests (the name of the commissioner who proposed each amendment is indicated in parentheses):

1. Livestock. An amendment to Chapter 20.07.10 (Defined Words, page 373) changing the definitions of livestock in urban agriculture to categorize them by size and weight, rather than by a list of species. (Brad Wisler)
2. Payment-in-lieu. An amendment to Chapter 20.04.0110(c)(7) (Payment-in-Lieu, page 205) clarifying the procedures and process for developers to use the payment-in-lieu of constructing affordable housing. It would require that the Common Council approve the process, and that the process must be consistent and standardized. The amendment would also clarify how the funds could be used. (Flavia Burrell) NOTE: This is a position that the Chamber has publicly supported.
3. Impervious surfaces, invasive species. Amendments recommended by the city’s Environmental Commission related to adding to the list of invasive species and proposing alternatives to impervious surfaces. (Jillian Kinzie, Karin St. John)
4. Partial demolition. An amendment to Chapter 20.06.50(c) (Demolition Delay Permit, page 268) to ensure that any partial demolition would not alter an historic structure's contributing designation status. (Susan Sandberg)
5. Financial surety. An amendment  to Chapter 20.06.60(c)(iii) (Subdivision Procedures-Secondary Plat, page 298) clarifying the financial surety requirements for secondary plats. (Neil Kopper)
6. PUD criteria. An amendment to Chapter 20.02.50(b) (Planned Unit Development District, page 51) making 6G ("Protection of specific natural, environmental, or scenic resources or green spaces") and 6H ("Retaining natural landforms throughout the development") as qualifying standards. Those are currently listed as "highly-valued" features, not requirements.  (Nick Kappas)
7. Student housing zone. An amendment to Chapter 20.02.30(a) (Mixed-Use Zoning Districts, Student Housing, page 21) providing greater specificity and clarity about where the student housing zones would be located, based on proximity to campus and characteristics. (Joe Hoffmann)
8. Review process. An amendment to Chapter 20.02.10(c)(1) (Zoning Districts Established, page 19) removing “with the City” and adding “with the City’s planning department and reviewed by the Plan Commission.”  (Nick Kappas)
9. Driveway cuts. An amendment to Chapter 20.04.50(c) (Access and Connectivity, page 124) allowing the option of having two driveway cuts for a duplex. (Nick Kappas)
10. Trees. An amendment to Chapter 20.04.80(e) (Table 4-18 Prohibited Plant Species, page 168) to change the classification of certain trees to "invasive" rather than "poor characteristics." (Nick Kappas)
11. Electric vehicle charging. An amendment to Chapter 20.04.60(I)(8) (Electric Vehicle Charging, page 147) to count those charging stations as part of the maximum number of parking spaces allowed. (Jillian Kinzie)

Draft amendments are expected to be posted on the city's UDO update site before the Sept. 5 meeting.

The following were considered "clean-up" amendments and were passed unanimously by Plan Commissioners at their Aug. 29 meeting. The amendment allows duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes as permitted uses for new subdivisions and undeveloped locations of the city, while keeping these "plexes" as conditional uses for other areas. The most recent draft had inadvertently designated all duplexes, triplexes and quadplexes as conditional uses. ​

With an overflow crowd in the council chambers balcony, the Bloomington Plan Commission held its first public hearing on the city's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) adoption draft on Monday, Aug. 26.

During the public commentary part of the meeting, 37 people gave input on the UDO draft. Almost all speakers addressed issues related to housing, evenly split in support of higher density or opposed to denser housing options in single-family neighborhoods.

(The final speaker asked that goats be removed from the UDO's definition of "medium livestock," which now also includes burros, sheep and swine. She suggested several changes to better accommodate keeping goats within city limits.)

​Mary Morgan, the Chamber's Director of Advocacy & Public Policy, spoke in support of changes that encourage building more housing for all income levels. "As local businesses attempt to recruit and retain staff, one common challenge is a lack of housing that's affordable for their workforce. We also need to provide more housing options for the younger generation, people in their 20s and 30s who are starting to put down roots here. This UDO helps achieve that goal."

She also advocated for a more transparent process related to the proposed payment-in-lieu option for affordable housing. Read Mary's full remarks here.

At their next hearing on Thursday, Aug. 29, Plan Commissioners will be asking staff to draft amendments based on feedback from the public. Those amendments will then be considered at their Sept. 5 meeting. The public can weigh in at both of those meetings, or can submit additional comments by emailing [email protected].

Watch the Aug. 26 meeting on CATS here. Get more info on the UDO process here.

The City of Bloomington has scheduled next steps in its efforts to overhaul the citywide zoning code.

The latest draft of the Unified Development Ordinance will be posted on the city's UDO website on Monday, Aug. 5. On that same date and site, an online comment form will be available for public input. [UPDATE: Here's a link to the new UDO draft.]

The city's Plan Commission will hold three hearings on the latest draft  in the city hall council chambers, 401 N. Morton. Those hearing dates are:

• Monday, Aug. 26 at 5:30 p.m.
• Thursday, Aug. 29 at 5:30 p.m.
• Thursday, Sept. 5 at 5:30 p.m.

​The Plan Commission can amend the UDO and will vote to approve a final draft after this latest round of public input. Then, the Bloomington Common Council will have 90 days in which to vote on the UDO. The council will also provide opportunities for input.

After the UDO is adopted, the new zoning will apply to new developments or additions to existing structures.

Click here for  the latest updates on the UDO.

The process of overhauling the UDO began in February 2018. The Chamber has provided input throughout the process. Our most recent comments focused on ensuring that the procedures specified in the UDO are consistent and standardized.